Tucker Carlson: "Here's the illusion we fall for time and again. We imagine that evil comes like fully advertised as such, like evil people look like Anton Lavey...Evil is an independent force that exists outside of people, that acts upon people...What vessel do they choose? The… pic.twitter.com/ugF3bMgxcx
Tucker Carlson: "Here's the illusion we fall for time and again. We imagine that evil comes like fully advertised as such, like evil people look like Anton Lavey...
Evil is an independent force that exists outside of people, that acts upon people...
What vessel do they choose? The weak. It's weak men and women who are instruments of evil. The weaker the leader, the more evil that leader will be...
Unfortunately we reached the time in American history where every leader is either a woman or a weak man pretty much...Mike Johnson...but he's a weak man and that's the man you should be afraid of....
Weak people just become a host for evil, an empty building that evil occupies, possesses even. And that's exactly what's happening to Mike Johnson. That's absolutely crazy what Mike Johnson is doing, but not because he's evil, it's because he's weak and therefore susceptible to evil..."
NEW: MSNBC’s finest, Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Joy Reid, melt down after the special counsel said that the mentally declining president is mentally declining.
The Three Stooges couldn’t fathom how the special counsel thought Biden had mental issues.
Quite clearly Biden is old, but the reducing of all of his mental
faculties down to specific examples is ludicrous. I bet every single
person reading this said something yesterday that, if taken in
isolation, would make them sound like an dottering fool.
While I’ve always been really good at dates, I’ve long been pretty
bad with names—an issue that has increased significantly in recent
years. I’m 58 and have no reason to think I’m going senile.
As for Biden, he’s clearly slowing down with age and is having more
of these mental lapses. But, while I wish there were a younger option
available, I think he’s still mentally up to the job—and light years
better than the seeming alternative, Donald Trump.
Alas, this isn’t an objective conversation. People are looking at
both candidates through partisan lenses and, like it or not, Biden’s
gaffes are judged much more harshly than Trump’s.
NPR’s Domenico Montanaro (“Biden’s rough week highlights his biggest vulnerability — one he can’t change“):
The special counsel report about Biden’s handling of classified material didn’t
charge him with a crime, but special counsel Robert Hur, a Republican,
seemed to go out of his way to include damning commentary about Biden’s
supposedly faulty memory, like referencing that Biden, 81, “did not
remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”
That was stinging.
“It clears him legally and kneecaps him politically,” Paul Begala, a
veteran Democratic strategist and former Bill Clinton adviser, said of
the report.
The 388-page report set off a political firestorm — and an ensuing clumsy response from the White House and the president himself.
Biden angrily rejected Hur’s claim, saying Thursday night in a press
conference he felt questions about Beau weren’t “any of their damn
business.”
The president got choked up while showing a rosary he was wearing on
his wrist in memory of Beau, then thundered, “I don’t need anyone to
remind me when he passed away.”
If Biden had left it at that, that might be what people remembered about the news conference.
Instead, Biden wound up walking right into the stereotype laid out by
Hur when he mistakenly said that President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi of
Egypt was the “president of Mexico” while answering a question about
current hostage negotiations with Israel and Hamas.
It’s a mistake. Verbal slips happen. Everyone makes them — including
Trump, who is only four years younger than Biden. Trump often meanders,
recently appeared to confuse his primary opponent Nikki Haley for former
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; on more than half a dozen occasions in the
past year mistakenly referred to former President Barack Obama when he
should have said Biden; and while in Iowa, called “Sioux City” “Sioux
Falls,” which is 90 miles up the road in South Dakota.
But because more Americans are concerned with
Biden’s age and fitness to do the job in a second term than they are
about Trump’s age, every time Biden makes a flub it will have more
resonance politically.
“It’s certainly true that anything that feeds the master negative
narrative is especially harmful,” Begala said. “For [Bill] Clinton, it
was cheating, for [George W.] Bush, it was ‘dumb,’ Obama ‘elitist,’
which is why when Obama said 57 states, it didn’t hurt him. If it was Bush, it would have.”
“Obviously with Biden, it’s ‘old.’ So, this really really hurts him.”
[…]
“Fair or not, this just amplified Biden’s greatest challenge,” David
Axelrod, a former senior adviser in the Obama White House, said of the
special counsel report. “It screams through every poll and focus group.”
Axelrod went viral back in November for raising whether it was “wise” for Biden to run for reelection after a series of swing-state polls showed him losing to Trump.
“Many people have made a judgment about his age and command and
discount his accomplishments and attribute every problem to it,” Axelrod
said.
The Atlantic‘s Yair Rosenberg (“What Biden’s Critics Get Wrong About His Gaffes“) tries to handwave this away:
[T]he truth is, mistakes like these are nothing new for Biden, who
has been mixing up names and places for his entire political career.
Back in 2008, he infamously introduced his
running mate as “the next president of the United States, Barack
America.” At the time, Biden’s well-known propensity for bizarre
tangents, ahistorical riffs, and malapropisms compelled Slate to publish an entire column explaining
“why Joe Biden’s gaffes don’t hurt him much.” The article included such
gems as the time that then-Senator Biden told the journalist Katie
Couric that “when the markets crashed in 1929, ‘Franklin Roosevelt got
on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He
said, “Look, here’s what happened.”’” The only problem with this story, Slate laconically noted, was that “FDR wasn’t president then, nor did television exist.”
In other words, even a cursory history of Biden’s bungling shows that
he is the same person he has always been, just older and slower—a
gaffe-prone, middling public speaker with above-average emotional
intelligence and an instinct for legislative horse-trading.
But he recognizes that there’s a perception problem and that the Biden team needs to address it head-on:
The president’s staff is understandably reluctant to put Biden front
and center, knowing that his slower speed and inevitable gaffes—both
real and fabricated—will
feed the mental-acuity narrative. But in actuality, the bar for Biden
has been set so laughably low that he can’t help but vault over it
simply by showing up. By contrast, limiting his appearances ensures that
the public mostly encounters the president through decontextualized
social-media clips of his slipups.
As Slate observed in 2008, the frequency of Biden’s
rhetorical miscues helped neutralize them in the eyes of the public. In
2024, Biden will have an assist from another source: Donald Trump. Among
other recent lapses, the former president has called Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “the leader of Turkey,” confused Nancy
Pelosi and Nikki Haley, and repeatedly expressed the strange belief
that he won the 2020 election. With an opponent prone to vastly worse
feats of viscous verbosity, Biden can’t help but look better by
comparison, especially if he starts playing offense instead of defense.
But none of this will happen by itself. If the president and his
campaign want the headlines to be something other than “Yes, Biden Knows
Who the President of Egypt Is,” they’ll have to start making news, not
reacting to it.
This strikes me as wishful thinking. Few people watch these speeches
and interviews in full. If the press seizes on the gaffes—and they
will—that’s what most will remember.
Gonzalo Lira, Sr. says his son has died at 55 in a Ukrainian prison, where he was being held for the crime of criticizing the Zelensky and Biden governments. Gonzalo Lira was an American citizen, but the Biden administration clearly supported his imprisonment and torture. Several… https://t.co/F0nOG9qGvv
strategic-culture | American President Joe Biden likes to talk about “inflexion points”
when he is lecturing about world affairs and the supposed superiority of
the United States. This year is indeed an inflexion point.
It was the year that the entire world saw the truly hideous and criminal nature of U.S. power.
Washington’s fueling of the futile conflict in Ukraine and the
despicable slaughter in Gaza is a wake-up call for the entire world. The
United States stands barefaced and grotesque as the primary purveyor of
war. There can be no doubt about that. For many it is shocking,
scandalous and frightening.
Tragically, it seems, for the world, every year’s end is an occasion
to witness and lament conflicts, wars and suffering over the preceding
12 months. Often the causes of wars and suffering are seemingly
unfathomable.
However, this year seems to be unique. The year ends with a
horrendous massacre in Gaza that is unprecedented and perpetrated by
Israel with the full support of the United States. The scale of
deliberate mass killing in Gaza makes it a genocide. The fact that this
abomination is occurring at Christmas time when the world is supposed to
celebrate the divine birth of Jesus Christ – the Prince of Peace – in
the very place where he was born some 2,000 years ago makes the
abomination all the more profane and damning.
What is particularly wretched is that the heinous destruction of
children is happening in full view of the world. There is no remorse or
pretence. It is full-blown premeditated murder done with cruelty and
sickening impunity.
Virtually the whole world is horrified by the devastating, relentless
violence and absolute violation of international law. The butchery by
the Israeli regime cannot in any way be rationalized by the previous
attack on Israel by Palestinian militants on October 7. Those killings
by Hamas have been cynically used as a pretext for the subsequent and
ongoing annihilation of Palestinian civilians.
This genocide could not happen without the crucial support of the
United States for the Israeli regime. Financially, militarily and
diplomatically, Washington is sponsoring the horror in Gaza as well as
the Occupied West Bank.
This week saw the U.S. once again obstructing calls at the United
Nations for a ceasefire and the urgent supply of humanitarian aid to
more than two million people. The World Food Program has declared a
catastrophic famine in the coastal enclave after more than 70 days of
bombing and blockade by the Israeli regime. More than 20,000 people –
mainly women and children – have been slaughtered with up to 7,000 more
missing, presumably dead. Israeli troops are carrying out mass
executions of terrified and traumatized human beings, according to UN
rights monitors.
The United States is arming Israel to the hilt and enabling it. U.S.
President Joe Biden has pointedly refused to join international demands
for a ceasefire. The United Nations has voted by an overwhelming
majority for a cessation of the violence. Washington has repeatedly
rejected the world’s pleas because the Biden administration is obscenely
amplifying Israeli lies and distortions. “Unwavering, unshakable
support” is how the White House arrogantly boasts about it without a
hint of shame that it is self-indicting.
Tens of thousands of tonnes of munitions have been flown to Israel to
carry out “indiscriminate bombing” (Biden’s own admission). One-tonne
bunker-buster bombs have been dropped deliberately on refugee camps and
hospitals. And still, the Pentagon shamelessly refuses to impose any red
lines on the use of its munitions.
This genocide has Israeli fingers on the triggers but it is
ultimately an American-sponsored genocide. Based on Nuremberg
principles, Joe Biden and Benjamin Netanyahu would be both in the dock,
accompanied by Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lloyd Austin and their
counterparts in Tel Aviv.
If there were previous international doubts about Washington’s systematic criminality, the whole world knows for certain now.
pacemaker | I've been waiting for today, knowing it was pre-planned and coming. Today in Riyadh at the China-Arab Summit President Xi of China formally invited the Arab nations to trade oil and gas in yuan on the Shanghai Exchange. Now the way diplomacy works (because it seems to have been forgotten in the West) is that Xi would not have made the invitation unless all the Arab states gathered in Riyadh - and particularly Saudi Arabia as host - had already agreed as a matter of joint policy to take action accordingly. Oil and gas will price in Shanghai and in yuan, breaking the dollar monopoly the US has imposed and enforced since 1974. Since the dollar-for-oil monopoly was the lynchpin of Bretton Woods II stability, it follows Bretton Woods II ended today.
To
refresh memories, President Nixon unilaterally repudiated the US treaty
obligation under the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement to redeem dollars for
gold in 1972. The chaos in foreign exchange markets that followed led
to instability, made worse with the inflationary OPEC oil embargo of
1973-74.
In July 1974 the US Treasury Secretary William Simon and US Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger made a top-secret flight to Riyadh to meet
King Fahd. They offered a deal: sell Saudi oil exclusively for US
dollars and buy US Treasuries with the proceeds, or we kill you, your
entire family, and occupy the oil fields with the US military. Unsurprisingly, they left with a secret agreement.
The
same deal was more or less extended to all of OPEC. Leaders like Saddam
Hussein of Iraq and Muammar Gaddafi of Libya who strayed from the US
dollar were killed, their countries destroyed and destablilsed, as an
example to others. Iran, Syria, and Venezuela have resisted more
successfully, but have been badly destabilised by US occupation, oil
theft, attempted coups, attempted assassinations, and economic
sanctions.
So today marks a big and admirably brave shift. After sending all the
weaponry it could spare to Ukraine all year, ending oil and gas trade
with Russia under sanctions, weakening allies with surging inflation,
and depleting the Strategic Petroleum Reserve of a record amount of oil
to blunt inflation before the midterm elections, the US is not in an
ideal position to launch wars in every Arab state at once. In fact, it
probably can't launch a war or coup even in Saudi Arabia because Saudi
Arabia will have prepared and provided for that risk. In any event, a
new war in the Middle East would make the inflationary shock of the
Ukraine war pale in comparison.
Signs of a shift have been in the wind all year. The fist bump and
low-key reception of President Biden compares poorly to the lavish state
reception of President Xi. Then Biden's attempt to get GCC states to
sanction Russia was unanimously rejected.
And
OPEC's outright refusal to defer oil production cuts until after the
American midterm elections was a further sign Saudi and OPEC+ no longer
take orders from Washington. Saudi took the unusual step of officially
rejecting the US request in public.
When
a presidential state visit by Xi to Saudi began leaking in the fall I
began to watch for confirmatory signs of OPEC moving East. There were
quite a few, but nothing as momentous as the extravagant welcome for
President Xi to Riyadh and the China-Arab Summit. President Xi and King
Salman signed a 30-year Strategic Partnership Agreement for cooperation
on virtually all forward economic plans yesterday: energy, telecoms,
investment, trade, infrastructure, regional development, Belt & Road
Initiative, etc. Significantly, the Agreement bars interference in
domestic affairs by either nation, a principle China has urged widely
for many years.
sputnik | US
politicians have been quick to make glib comparisons between Russia's
de-Nazification operation in Ukraine and Hitler's invasion of Europe or
terrorist outrages. Scott Ritter, a former US Marine Corps intelligence
officer, said Joe Biden couldn't even string such an argument together.
US President Joe Biden lacks the mental ability to draw parallels between Russia and Hamas, says a former US Marine.
The
Washington Post ran an op-ed under Biden's byline at the weekend,
likening the Palestinian Islamic resistance movement Hamas' breakout
from the besieged Gaza Strip on October 7 to Russia's military operation
in Ukraine in defence of the Russian-speaking Donbass region —
following eight years of Ukrainian shelling of civilians.
Biden "didn't write this" as he "doesn't have the mental capacity," Ritter told Sputnik.
"I'm
not picking on him, I'm just being honest," he said. "This was written
by his national security staff. It was edited by Jake Sullivan. I
believe [US Secretary of State] Tony Blinken came in with a lot of stuff
that this was a collaborative effort by the people who are managing Joe
Biden."
"This
is the story, not the content of the op-ed," Ritter stressed. "The
story is that Joe Biden, the president of the United States is lacking
in such mental capacity that the presidency is being managed by people
who weren't elected to do that job. That's what people should be worried
about."
But
he said the words attributed to Biden no longer carry the same weight
as comments by previous presidents, thanks to the proliferation of
alternatives to the mainstream media.
"So
when Joe Biden or his managers publish an op-ed of this nature, it no
longer has the same cachet, the same impact that it would have ten years
ago," Ritter argued. "Today, it's immediately cancelled out as
ridiculous as absurd."
Ritter wrote for Consortium News last week that Biden and Blinken were being disingenuous in their call for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, given that no Israeli leader in decades has been serious about implementing it.
"Even
if such a governing coalition could be crafted together to politically
sustain the idea of a two-state solution that fails to resonate with
Israelis and Palestinians alike, there remains the ultimate hurdle that
needs to be cleared before any notion of a lasting peace between Israeli
and Palestinian states premised on the notion of equality — Israel’s
nuclear weapons program," Ritter wrote.
The former weapons inspector said Israel's nuclear program had been "shrouded in ambiguity from the moment it was born, back in the 1960s when they actually produced a weapon."
"The
United States has been the principal reason why this has happened,"
Ritter pointed out. "The Nixon administration was confronted with the
fact that Israel had nuclear weapons. We knew it. And they were in
violation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, because even if they
didn't sign the treaty, we signed the treaty. And the treaty only allows
five declared nuclear powers. So we would have to sanction Israel."
MSDNC | But at a press conference at the end of the meeting, Biden made a
pointed remark that underscored the gulf between the two countries.
Asked by a reporter if he stood by his characterization of Xi in June
as a “dictator,” Biden answered that he did. “Well, look, he is. I
mean, he’s a dictator in the sense that he is a guy who runs a country
that is a communist country that’s based on a form of government totally
different than ours,” Biden said. “Anyway, we made progress.”
As he said this, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who was seated in the front row, visibly winced. Blinken’s apparent pain at his boss’ blunt language has gone viral — inspiring mockery
of the Biden administration, and prompting some right-wing commentators
to describe Biden’s language as a sign of senility-induced
incompetence. David Sacks, a right-wing venture capitalist, posted on X,
“This was a bumbling act of senility in which Biden fell for a
reporter’s obvious gotcha question, erased the whole point of the
diplomatic summit, and caused his own staff to shake their heads in
disbelief.” Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing commentator, observed in a response to Sacks: “China would be foolish to trust anything the Biden administration offers them at this point.”
Is
Biden’s age a valid concern as he pursues another term in office? Yes.
Does that definitively explain his behavior here? No. The simplest
explanation is that Biden was being Biden.
First, it’s unclear that Biden’s comment could even be characterized as a
gaffe. The question, after all, was whether the president would disavow
a view he articulated just a few months ago. Biden knew if he changed
his position he would be vulnerable to attacks of inconsistency out of
political expediency. China has the same style of government today that
it had in the summer, and there is nothing inaccurate about what Biden
said. Biden is also aware that the right is constantly looking to attack
him for being soft on China, and that very well may have happened if he
had used softer language. It’s a bit of a damned-if-you-do,
damned-if-you-don’t scenario when it comes to Biden’s critics on the
right.
Second, even if one assumes that Biden veered from the kind
of language his staff advised him to use, anyone who hasn’t been living
under a rock knows that Biden has misspoken, said something off-color,
or unexpectedly deviated from talking points for his entire political career — particularly in the realm of foreign policy.
As senator, vice president and now president, Biden tends to feel
confident making edgy off-the-cuff remarks that cause others headaches.
It’s difficult to argue that any impolitic comment he makes can be
attributed to his age when this is the same man who, as vice president, forced former President Barack Obama to change his position on same-sex marriage by freelancing on the issue on “Meet the Press.” (Biden has even called himself “a gaffe machine.”)
So even if one wants to argue that Biden was behaving incompetently,
the bar for proving that it has to do with declining mental acuity is
high.
Blinken’s reaction was funny to witness, a rare
example of a seasoned diplomat shedding their poker face. But it doesn’t
mean Blinken thought Biden didn’t know what he was doing — he could’ve
simply disagreed with the president’s on-the-fly judgment. It’s possible
he would have preferred that Biden had, for example, ignored the
reporter’s question and shifted the topic to focusing on the progress
that had been made at the summit, thereby neither confirming nor denying
the question. Perhaps Blinken would’ve valued such a response after a
summit when the U.S. and China made substantial diplomatic progress and
their heads of state were unusually chummy with each other — including sharing nostalgic photos, exchanging birthday wishes and showing off their presidential cruisers.
But unlike Blinken, Biden is primed to consider domestic audiences more
than international ones; their judgment on this could simply be
irreconcilable.
WaPo | Today, the world faces an inflection point, where the choices we make — including in the crises in Europe and the Middle East — will determine the direction of our future for generations to come. What will our world look like on the other side of these conflicts?
Will we deny Hamas the ability to carry out pure, unadulterated evil? Will Israelis and Palestinians one day live side by side in peace, with two states for two peoples?
Will we hold Vladimir Putin accountable for his aggression, so the people of Ukraine can live free and Europe remains an anchor for global peace and security?
And the overarching question: Will we relentlessly pursue our positive vision for the future, or will we allow those who do not share our values to drag the world to a more dangerous and divided place?
Both Putin and Hamas are fighting to wipe a neighboring democracy off the map. And both Putin and Hamas hope to collapse broader regional stability and integration and take advantage of the ensuing disorder. America cannot, and will not, let that happen. For our own national security interests — and for the good of the entire world.
The United States is the essential nation. We rally allies and partners to stand up to aggressors and make progress toward a brighter, more peaceful future. The world looks to us to solve the problems of our time. That is the duty of leadership, and America will lead. For if we walk away from the challenges of today, the risk of conflict could spread, and the costs to address them will only rise. We will not let that happen.
We have also seen throughout history how conflicts in the Middle East can unleash consequences around the globe.
We stand firmly with the Israeli people as they defend themselves against the murderous nihilism of Hamas. On Oct. 7, Hamas slaughtered 1,200 people, including 35 American citizens, in the worst atrocity committed against the Jewish people in a single day since the Holocaust. Infants and toddlers, mothers and fathers, grandparents, people with disabilities, even Holocaust survivors were maimed and murdered. Entire families were massacred in their homes. Young people were gunned down at a music festival. Bodies riddled with bullets and burned beyond recognition. And for over a month, the families of more than 200 hostages taken by Hamas, including babies and Americans, have been living in hell, anxiously waiting to discover whether their loved ones are alive or dead. At the time of this writing, my team and I are working hour by hour, doing everything we can to get the hostages released.
geopoliticaleconomy | It is crucial to stress that Israel is an extension of U.S.
geopolitical power in one of the most critically important regions of
the world.
In fact, it was current U.S. President Joe Biden, back in 1986, when he was a senator, who famously said that, if Israel didn’t exist, the United States would have to invent it:
If we look at the Middle East, I think it’s about time we
stop, those of us who support, as most of us do, Israel in this body,
for apologizing for our support for Israel.
There is no apology to be made. None. It is the best $3 billion investment we make.
Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to
invent an Israel to protect her interest in the region; the United
States would have to go out and invent an Israel.
I am with my colleagues who are on the floor of the Foreign Relations
Committee, and we worry at length about NATO; and we worry about the
eastern flank of NATO, Greece and Turkey, and how important it is. They
pale by comparison…
They pale by comparison in terms of the benefit that accrues to the United States of America.
First of all, it goes without saying that the so-called Middle East,
or a better term is West Asia, has some of the world’s largest reserves
of oil and gas, and the entire economic infrastructure all around the
world relies on fossil fuels.
The world is gradually moving toward new energy sources, but fossil
fuels are still absolutely critical to the entire global economy. And
Washington’s goal has been to make sure that it can maintain steady
prices in the global oil and gas markets.
But this is about something much bigger than just oil and gas. The
U.S. military’s stated policy since the 1990s, since the end of the Cold
War and the overthrow of the Soviet Union, is that the United States
has tried to maintain control over every region of the world.
This was stated very clearly by the U.S. National Security Council in 1992 in the so-called Wolfowitz Doctrine. The U.S. National Security Council wrote:
[The United States’] goal is to preclude any hostile
power from dominating a region critical to our interests, and also
thereby to strengthen the barriers against the reemergence of a global
threat to the interests of the U.S. and our allies. These regions
include Europe, East Asia, the Middle East/Persian Gulf, and Latin
America. Consolidated, nondemocratic control of the resources of such a
critical region could generate a significant threat to our security.
Then, in 2004, the U.S. government published its National Military Strategy, in which Washington stressed that its goal was “Full Spectrum Dominance – the ability to control any situation or defeat any adversary across the range of military operations”.
Now, historically, when it came to the Middle East, the U.S. relied
on a so-called “twin pillar” strategy. The west pillar was Saudi Arabia,
and the east pillar was Iran. And until the 1979 revolution in Iran,
the country was governed by a dictator, a shah, the monarch, who was
backed by the United States and served U.S. interests in the region.
However, with the 1979 revolution, the U.S. lost one of the pillars
of its twin pillar strategy, and Israel became increasingly important
for the United States to maintain control over this crucially strategic
region.
It is not just the massive oil reserves and gas reserves in the
region; it is not just the fact that many of the world’s top oil and gas
producers are located in West Asia.
It is also the fact that some of the most important trading routes on Earth also go through this region.
It would be difficult to overstate how important Egypt’s Suez Canal
is. This connects trade from the Middle East going into Europe, from the
Red Sea into the Mediterranean, and around 30% of all of the world’s shipping containers pass through the Suez Canal. That represents around 12% of the total global trade of all goods.
Then, directly south of the Suez Canal, where the Red Sea enters the
Arabian Sea, you have a crucial geostrategic choke point known as the Bab al-Mandab Strait, right off the coast of Yemen. And there, more than 6 million barrels of oil pass through every single day.
PCR | US Representative Matt Gaetz has courage and principles, for the most part good ones.
It was Gaetz who had the courage and leadership ability to get rid of Rino McCarthy as Speaker of the House.
It is Gaetz who understands that hardly any member of Congress in either party represents Americans.Instead, they represent the military/security complex’s power and profits, the profits of the pharmaceutical companies,the
profits of agri-business (ethanol for example), the profits of Wall
Street, the profits of energy, timber, and mining, and so forth.And especially, the US Congress represents the artificial state of Israel and all of Israel’s agendas.
Indeed, Matt Gaetz himself cannot escape having to support an occupier of Palestinians’ land, claiming that it is Israel’s.The
fact that even a brave man like Matt Gaetz has to support an aggressor
against a people abandoned by the “moral” West shows how captured the US
government is at all levels by vested monied interests.
Gaetz along with the entirely of the US Congress and the President
are purchased by the billions of dollars that American taxpayers are
forced to hand over to Israel each year. American taxpayers are forced to give Israel annually billions of dollars that are used to purchase our government. Israel, considered a rich country, does not need foreign aid, but any member of Congress who does not vote forIsrael’s billions finds in his next election a challenger financed by Israel’s billionsand
himself a victim of Israel’s slander machine. The same thing happens if
you vote against an excessive military/security budget or against the
agendas of powerful organized interests. A government whose election is
financed by interest groups has to represent those interest groups.
So, obviously, the solution is not term limits on members of Congress.The
solution is to take the money that Congress gives Israel to buy our
government out of politics along with the ability of corporations to
purchase the US government, thanks to an unconstitutional ruling of the
US Supreme Court that it is a “free speech right”for corporations and foreign interests to purchase the US government for their own use.
There you have it. The US government is a purchased entity. It has
nothing whatsoever to do with American interests or protecting the
interests of the American people.
What needs to be done?
Matt Gaetz, the conservatives and libertarians naively think that term limits is the answer.This
is another of Americans’ insouciant mistakes. The real solution is to
extend, not limit, the terms of members of Congress and to give Congress
the police powerson which
Congress’ enemy–the executive branch–has a monopoly. The corrupt Justice
Department can frame up and arrest members of Congress, and Congress
has no corresponding powers.
The founding fathers distrusted democracy because of their fear of
ignorant mobs. For this reason they limited the terms of US
Representatives to two years.So
US Representatives and Senators are turned into whores prostituting
themselves for reelection money as soon as they are elected. It is never
possible for Congress or the President to represent American’s
interests.
This is because of money.The
solution is to take out of politics the ability of corporations,
Israel, and foreign interests to purchase the services of the US
Government, which as a result of interest group funding of election
campaigns turns the US government into a whore.The
Founding Fathers should have lengthened the terms of Congress and the
President, prohibited all outside money from financing election
campaigns, and financed at taxpayer expense free speech forums for
candidates to debate their differences. They also made a mistake by creating a legislative body too large for a common interest to emerge. This failure of the Founding Fathers doomed America to the control of vested interests.
The Democrats when they limited the terms of committee chairmen
eliminated legislative power centers that could stand up to the
executive branch and thereby weakened Congress as an institution.
catyjohnstone | Propagandists
are used to having a lot more wiggle room to work with than this.
They’re used to interfacing with a complex matrix of narrative and
manipulating it to distort the public’s understanding of what’s going
on. But raw video footage of a mother clutching the tattered remains of a
child is not narrative. Satellite images of powdered city blocks are
not narrative. It’s just reality. Right there in your face.
Western civilization is dominated by propaganda. The “freedom” and “democracy” we think we have is an illusion that has been carefully cultivated by those who manipulate the way we think, speak, act and vote by mass-scale psychological manipulation
— as Chomsky says, propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to
a totalitarian state. A mind-controlled dystopia is not some dark
future that awaits humanity if things go terribly wrong for us; it is already presently the case.
The Gaza massacre throws a big fat monkey wrench in all that, because the raw data
coming out of it is so transparently horrifying that no amount of
narrative spin can make it look acceptable. The fact that the US and its
allies are helping Israel murder children by the thousands is a giant
glitch in the narrative matrix.
The
longer this continues, the more people are going to wake up out of the
propaganda-induced coma the empire has had them in all their lives. The
more people are going to realize that their government is not what it
has been pretending to be and the media have not been telling them the
truth about the world. As the western empire backs the slaughter of
thousands of children, the discrepancies between what the propaganda
tells us about our society and what our society actually is are being
brightly illuminated.
By
murdering thousands of children in Gaza, the empire has exposed its
true face in front of everyone. And the people aren’t liking what they
see.
Eyes are opening everywhere. People are being radicalized in record numbers. The streets are being flooded with protesters.
Very inconvenient questions are being asked. Rigorous scrutiny is being
applied in places it was seldom applied before. Light is shining in
through cracks that weren’t there before.
This
is all so, so horrible and so, so painful to watch day in and day out.
But something is moving underneath it all. Something big. The empire has
done irreparable harm to its ability to keep everyone sleeping and
complacent going forward. A healthy world may be in our future yet.
Aurelian2022 | In reality, the relationship between the use of force and the
attainment of a defined political objective is a highly complex, inexact
and uncertain art, and is much easier to explain theoretically than to
do in practice. It implies a whole series of complicated, asserted
relationships that don’t necessarily exist tidily in real life. To begin
with, of course, you need to have a defined political objective, which
is agreed, practicable and measurable. Bombing somebody, or firing off
some shells like the French ship, is not an objective in itself, and is
often indistinguishable from a display of pique to make yourself feel
better. What the military call the “end-state” has to be clearly
distinguishable from the current state, not to mention better than it,
or there is no point in pursuing it.
You also have to be
reasonably sure of how the political end-state will play out, or you
could be in a worse situation than you were at the start. This implies a
realistic knowledge of the political situation you are trying to
affect, and what the political consequences of your military actions
might be. So the NATO bombing campaign against Serbia in 1999 was
intended to humiliate the government of Slobodan Milosevic by forcing
the surrender of Kosovo, and so remove him from power in the elections
the following year. It was assumed that the government that replaced his
would be grateful to NATO for bombing them, and would adopt a
pro-western, pro-NATO stance. What was not anticipated (well, except by
those of us who were paying attention) was that Milosevic would be
brought down by nationalist agitation, and replaced by a hard-line
nationalist President, Kostunica. And as for the idea that a teetering
Gaddafi, perhaps on the point of being overthrown in 2011, could be
pushed over the brink by western intervention, leading to a stable,
pro-western democratic system … well if there is a stronger word than
“catastrophic” to put before “misunderstanding” let’s by all means use
it. Oh, and let’s not even get into the political fantasies of western
capitals about what would follow the forced resignation of Vladimir
Putin.
So this use-of-force-for political-objectives thing
looks a bit more complicated than we thought at first sight, doesn’t it?
It also means that you might just get your fingers trapped in the
wringer. For example, the US has deployed two carrier battle groups to
the eastern Mediterranean. Now, this is a traditional action of
governments that have no other options really open to them, and not, of
itself, necessarily criticable. In the circumstances there is a
political obligation to do something, whatever
that something might be. And to be fair, carriers are very useful for
evacuating foreign nationals, under military protection or otherwise, as
the French showed in Beirut in 2006.
The problem is that it’s virtually certain that the carrier groups have
been deployed according to this “do something” logic, which is to say
that there is almost certainly no accompanying political strategy: as
often, the US is making it up as it goes along. (Talking about
“deterrence” or “stabilisation” is not a strategy, it’s an attempt at a
justification.) The difficulty with all such deployments, though, is
that they are much easier to start than stop. To withdraw the force is
to send a political message that you think the crisis is over, or at
least manageable, which may not be the message you want to send. So you
keep the force in position, and eventually you replace it, because you
don’t have any choice. The difficulty is that, apart from evacuations,
there’s almost nothing for which the career group can be usefully
employed. Intelligence gathering maybe, but there are far easier and
more discreet ways of doing that. In the meantime, they are large
targets, probably limited to flying patrols and not much else. (I’m
assuming that the US would not be so insane as to join in the
bombardment of Gaza itself.)
In turn, this reflects the
effective impotence of the US in the present conflict. Its historical
attempt to combine the positions of independent facilitator with doglike
devotion to one side was always dubious, but was tolerated insofar as
the country was actually able to have some influence. That’s clearly no
longer true. Nobody in the Arab world is going to be influenced by the
US now, and it has also ruled itself out of any influence over Iran,
Hezbollah and Hamas. Biden’s initial maximalist rhetoric has effectively
given away most of the influence the US might have been able to assert
over Israel as well. Which doesn’t leave a lot, and doesn’t leave a lot
for US military power to actually do, either.
In any event,
even if a decision were made to use military power, in a political
vacuum, and just to look threatening, what could the US actually do? For
the moment, nothing. Now if a major ground invasion were to start in Gaza, and if
Hezbollah were to react militarily along the northern frontier, then
theoretically the US could target them, but with massive attendant risks
to the Lebanese population, and considerable risk of casualties to
itself, in other places where there are US troops. Put simply, an attack
agains Hezbollah which is large enough to make a difference could cause
massive collateral damage to Lebanon, whereas anything smaller will not
make a difference anyway. The US has invested massively in the
stability of Lebanon in recent years, and is not to going to put that
investment in jeopardy now.
There is certainly every chance
that Iran would consider a large-scale attack on Hezbollah to be an
unfriendly action, and then retaliate. The problem for the Americans is
that the Iranians can inflict far more damage on them and their
interests than they can inflict on the Iranians. This is nothing to do
with the sophistication, or even numbers, of weapons: it’s a lot more
mundane than that. Get out a map, and have a look at the region, and ask
yourself, where could US carrier groups safely go? Which countries
could be expected to provide airfields, ports and harbours and logistic
depots? In the present political situation, the answer is probably
“none.” No doubt an air- and sea-launched missile attack on Iran could
do some damage, but what would be the point? What possible proportional
political objective could be served thereby? No conceivable amount of
damage caused to Iran could compel the government, for example, to cut
off support for Hezbollah, or for the current government in Syria. By
contrast, severe damage to a single carrier, even if it were not sunk,
would be enough to drive the US out of the region.
I think we
can draw some general lessons from these examples, which in turn may
help us understand how the current Gaza crisis may eventually resolve
itself. We can start by recalling that the theory of using military
power to achieve political end-states is important, but primarily as a
limitation. That’s to say that, whilst military action without a
political objective is pointless, the mere fact of starting military
action towards a declared political end-state doesn’t mean that you will
automatically get there. You still have to do the hard work of turning
the one into the other, and it’s that that I want to talk about now.
Consider
a political end-state of some kind. It doesn’t have to be heaven on
earth or for that matter the surrender of your enemy. It can be
something simpler, such as an enforceable decision by your neighbour to
stop supporting separatist groups in your country. So let’s assume you
define that political end-state, which we’ll call P(E). Now the first
thing to say is that this political end-state must actually be
politically (not just militarily) possible. It must be within the
capacity of the other government to agree to, or failing that the
balance of political forces at the end of the conflict must at least
make it possible. It is pointless and dangerous to attempt to force a
country or a political actor do do something that is beyond their power
to do; not that this hasn’t been attempted often enough.
sputnik | Asked whether there should be a ceasefire in the conflict between Israel and Hamas, US President Joe Biden said in an interview for CBS that Israel has to go after Hamas and called them a “bunch of cowards.” “Israel is going after a group of people who have engaged in barbarism that is as consequential as the Holocaust. And so, I think Israel has to respond. They have to go after Hamas. Hamas is a bunch of cowards. They’re hiding behind the civilians,” Biden said. Gaza is a small, densely populated 140.9 square meter area with over 2 million people. Travel in and out of Gaza is heavily controlled by Israeli forces. Biden emphasized that Hamas needs to be “eliminated entirely.” Biden also said that he is in talks with Egypt and Israel about the establishment of a humanitarian corridor in the area.
“We’re also talking to Egyptians whether there is an outlet to get these children and women out of that area at this moment. But it’s hard,” Biden said in the interview. The US President also responded “yes” when asked if he supported humanitarian aid being sent to Gaza, something Israel has been blocking, including food, water and electricity, though Israel announced on Sunday that some water services had been turned back on. At least 13 Americans have been missing since Hamas’ attack, and 30 Americans have been confirmed dead. Biden said that the US is trying every avenue they have to see its remaining citizens returned safely but would not provide details. The interviewer noted that Biden had called the missing Americans’ families and spoke to them on Zoom.
While Biden consistently stressed throughout the interview that the United States supports Israel in their fight against Hamas, he suggested that they do not attempt to occupy Gaza. “I think it’d be a big mistake. Look, what happened in Gaza, in my view, Hamas and the extreme elements of Hamas don’t represent all the Palestinian people. And I think that … It would be a mistake … for Israel to occupy … Gaza again,” Biden said. Biden added that he does not think committing American troops will be necessary in the conflict. The President stressed that he still supports a two-state solution in the area, which has long been the official US policy, but said that right now is not the time to press for it. He also said that the normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia is not dead because of the conflict. “The Saudis, and the Emiratis, and other Arab nations understand that their security and stability is enhanced if there’s normalization of relations with Israel,” Biden said. “It’s just going to take time to get done.”
Biden also addressed the conflict in Ukraine, saying that the United States can handle both it and Israel at the same time. “We’re the United States of America for God’s sake, the most powerful nation in the history– not in the world, in the history of the world. The history of the world. We can take care of both of these and still maintain our overall international defense.” The United States has provided at least $111 billion to Ukraine since the start of Russia’s special operation. Earlier this month, an additional $24 billion in aid was blocked by a group of House Republicans. That debate resulted in the ousting of House Speaker Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Congress is now frozen until a new speaker is elected. The White House has continued to ask Congress for aid for both Ukraine and Israel. When asked if the situation in Congress threatens world security, Biden responded “yes,” putting the blame on “MAGA Republicans.”
WSJ | As
explosions rang out and bullets flew over Tamir Erez’s home in Mefalsim
near the Gaza Strip border, he said he kept asking himself, “Where is
the Israeli military?” He fled town with his children holding their
heads down so they couldn’t see the bodies of dead Israelis killed by
Palestinian militants.
“It will take a long time for us to recover from this day,” Erez said.
Israel’s failure to anticipate an attack Saturday
that left hundreds of soldiers and civilians dead and militants
rampaging through villages punctured a sense of invincibility built on
its vaunted military and intelligence apparatus. It left the world
questioning what went wrong and Israel’s leaders facing pressure to
retaliate with overwhelming force.
The assault came as Israel faces its most difficult series of threats
in the decades since what remains the country’s greatest security
failure, the Yom Kippur War, the surprise attack launched 50 years ago
this week by Egyptian and Syrian forces.
Iran has provided unprecedented coordination
among the forces of several militant groups, including Hamas in Gaza
and Hezbollah in Lebanon, and stoked deadly conflict in the West Bank,
putting Israel at risk on three fronts.
Using
rockets, paragliders, motorcycles, pickup trucks, and boats, Hamas
militants from the Gaza Strip launched a coordinated attack that showed
an unexpected level of sophistication.
Israeli
forces appeared to be caught completely by surprise as Hamas militants
in Gaza used bulldozers to tear down the security fence with Israel and
streamed into the country.
How Israel’s Iron Dome works
Interception
The missile destroys the incoming rocket by exploding near it.
Launcher
Each has 20 interceptor missiles
with an in-built radar seeker
Mobile control Unit
Analyses trajectory, estimates impact point and commands launch of interceptor missile
Radar
Identifies rocket shell
Source: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
“Clearly
this was a well-planned operation that didn’t just emerge overnight and
it’s surprising it was not detected by Israel or any of its security
partners,” said Brian Katulis, vice president of policy at the Middle
East Institute think tank in Washington. “It’s hard to think of a
security failure of this magnitude in Israel’s recent history.”
Israeli security leaders had played down the threat from Hamas
in recent months, as the group abstained from conflicts started by its
smaller ally in Gaza, Palestinian Islamic Jihad. There was a sense that
Israel, with its Iron Dome air defense systems, had rendered ineffective
Gaza’s main threat of short-range rockets.
Last
month, the Israeli military confidently characterized Gaza as being in a
state of “stable instability,” suggesting that the dangers posed by
Hamas militants were largely contained.
Recent
Israeli intelligence assessments of Hamas were that the militant group
had shifted its focus to trying to stoke violence in the West Bank and
that it was looking to avoid launching major attacks from Gaza in an
effort to avoid the kinds of punishing Israeli military responses that
have devastated the isolated area in the past.
twitter | The Department of Homeland security is officially out of their fucking mind.
Check out the “reasons” they’re labeling Americans as right wing extremists now:
• Combat veterans who are quote unquote “disgruntled about the takeover of their country.” (Well, at least they’re saying the quiet part out loud now.)
• Anyone that opposes war…because as you know, nothing is more “extreme” than not wanting to drone bomb kids and fight by proxy wars for Lindsay Graham and the rest of the murderers over at the banks and the military industrial complex.
• People that don’t think they should be paying income taxes because Congress violated the Constitution in the first place to push it through by lying to everyone…which is actually 100% accurate. They did the same thing with the Federal Reserve.
• Anyone that opposes the Feds restricting their 2nd amendment rights, even though it’s literally within our rights to.
• Anyone with a better explanation to all these mass shootings and domestic terrorist attacks than our lying ass government who blatantly committed some of them and allowed others to happen while poorly covering it up. (9/11, Oklahoma Bombing, Ruby Ridge, Las Vegas shooting, anyone?)
• Anyone who opposes open borders, which is most people…so good luck with that.
• Anyone against abortion because hey…Planned Parenthood isn’t buying off politicians for nothing.
• Anyone that considers themselves a “Patriot” because….well, you’re getting in the way of them destroying the country you love, silly!
• Anyone that brings up the US Constitution, you know…that thing that restricts these assholes from doing the exact same things they’re doing now.
• Supports a 3rd party candidate, because how dare you not vote for the useless, shit candidates the parties shove down our throats every election cycle! These people need to maintain their privileged status quo!
• Anyone that wants to audit the Federal Reserve… because how dare you want to know how they keep losing track of trillions of dollars! (Meanwhile they hired 87,000 IRS agents to nickel and dime the rest of us about what we sell on EBay.)
• Anyone that opposes a carbon tax to a World Bank. (Yes, that’s literally how they word it too, but I’m glad that was also considered just a “conspiracy theory.”)
• And finally…anyone that opposes the United Nations or the WHO, even though the UN has been raping women and children in 3rd world countries for decades and the WHO just tried to kill everyone with a poisoned shot over a virus they also illegally made in a lab to kill and control everybody.
If I had been a war veteran…I would have dinged for all 13 out of 13 of these. Read between these lines and it becomes clear that our country has been taken over by bad actors, and this is the “defense” against honest Americans and patriots from being vocal in wanting to take it back.
No one is coming to save us and we’re not voting our way out of this. A war of misinformation and manipulation can only be won with the truth…and with FOX dead in the water between firing Tucker and apparently donating money to literal Satanists…we must defend alternative sites like Twitter, Bitchute, Rumble, and GAB with everything we have.
Stop complying to tyranny, stop paying taxes to the people trying to kill you and rape your kids, and stop letting these people get away with doing whatever the hell they want.
They only have “power” because we let them…and I no longer consent to this illegitimate, out of control government that hates me.
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...